Comment on the New Chicago Ward Map

January 22nd, 2012

On 1/19/12, the City Council of Chicago approved a new ward map.

This ward map, shaped by racial power politics, threatens to hurt economic development by —

(1) gerrymandering some commercial and industrial areas into pieces requiring the cooperation of several aldermen in order to frame effective economic strategies, and

(2) separating some of these commercial and industrial areas from their surrounding neighborhoods, further diminishing the chances for coordinated economic development plans.

By fragmenting commercial and industrial areas, and by separating these from their surrounding neighborhoods, the alderman appear to have actually diminished their own effective power to improve the Chicago economy on the most local level.

The racial-ethnic caucuses in the Chicago City Council now have to show whether they are good for anything else other than perpetuating their own existence.

Racial and ethnic self-determination must actually be capable of improving an economy. The alderman appear to have instead marginalized themselves away from effective economic development.

Ineffective racial-ethnic stake-holding makes a useless mockery of the politics of self-determination. The measure of such self-determination must always be resultant economic development.

Instead, will the principal jobs saved by the new map be limited to the jobs of the aldermen themselves?

This ward map threatens to be more about self-perpetuation than about self-determination.

© Copyright 2012, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

An Important Review of Misleading Statistics on Homosexuality

January 22nd, 2012

There are few more contentious topics than statistics on same-sex behavior.

When popular truisms are questioned by professional scientists, as were Alfred C. Kinsey‘s statistics by the American Statistical Association in 1954, the response from the popular media is often dead silence. The general public is still not aware of the devastating debunking of Kinsey’s numbers by some of the world’s best statisticians:

“Critics are justified in their objections that many of the most interesting and provocative statements in the [Kinsey 1948] book are not based on the data presented therein, and it is not made clear to the reader on what evidence the statements are based. Further, the conclusions drawn from data presented in the book are often stated by KPM [Kinsey, Pomeroy, and Martin] in much too bold and confident a manner. Taken cumulatively, these objections amount to saying that much of the writing in the book falls below the level of good scientific writing.”

Cochran, William Gemmell, W. O. Jenkins, Frederick Mosteller, and John Wilder Tukey. 1954. Statistical problems of the Kinsey Report on Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. American Statistical Association, National Research Council (U.S.). Committee for Research in Problems of Sex – Psychology

Now Wheaton College provost Stanton L. Jones has published a comprehensive review and correction of misleading same-sex statistics. An abbreviated version of this article appeared in the February 2012 First Things. But here is the extended version, with references, from the Center for Applied Christian Ethics (CACE).

In his CACE article, Prof. Jones addresses what he calls “false beliefs about homosexuality”:

    “Being gay is just as healthy, both in terms of mental health and physical health, as being straight;
    sexual orientation, just like race, is a biologically determined given to which environmental variables such as family and culture contribute nothing and to which individuals make no voluntary contribution;
    sexual orientation cannot be changed, and thus the attempt to change is intrinsically harmful;
    homosexual relationships are equivalent to heterosexual marriage in all important characteristics; and
    identity is properly and legitimately constituted around sexual orientation.”

“Sexual Orientation and Reason: On the Implications of False Beliefs about Homosexuality,” by Stanton L. Jones, Center for Applied Christian Ethics, accessed 1/21/12

I thank Prof. Stanton L. Jones for his important and reasoned contribution to a topic too often ruled by mythology and propaganda.

Please see my earlier critique of Kinsey for further background on this question.

© Copyright 2012, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

Update: Connecting Economic Recovery with the Advancement of Immigrants

January 16th, 2012

Distinguished urban planner, demographer, and USC Professor Dowell Myers has issued an update in the 1/11/12 New York Times of his arguments on why a thriving immigrant population is so important for US economic development.

Please see my earlier post taking up this same topic and mentioning Prof. Myer’s book, Immigrants and Boomers.

© Copyright 2012, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

Aphorism XLIV

January 14th, 2012

To embrace philosophies that support abortion, philosophies that assume life as merely random or episodic rather than also transcendent and continuous, is for the proponents of LGBTQ rights not only a moral and philosophical error but a strategic and political mistake.

The very respect for their own persons that LGBTQ people desire is more consistently affirmed by a philosophy of life, not a philosophy of death. Reported cases of selective abortion against LGBTQ tendencies show that abortion is not the friend of LGBTQ persons. Abortion can turn unpredictably against its sponsors.

Abortion, and the philosophies it calls forth to justify itself, together corrode both the very rights and the very dignity of those who support them.

For the sake of political expediency, LGBTQ leaders have allied with the forces of abortion, for abortion is supported by civil libertarians historically sympathetic to LGBTQ rights.

There is more than a mere paradox here, but a powerful contradiction.

The corrosive, chaotic, and self-contradicting philosophies supporting abortion inevitably undermine the rights and standing of persons. To claim that one human at the highest point of vulnerability in the womb has no rights is to claim that some vulnerable humans have no rights. To claim that some humans have no rights opens the door for other vulnerable humans to have no rights.

Current postmodern “theory,” subject to daily reinvention by any self-proclaimed poet’s or professor’s whims, has no ability to draw any such line for human life and human rights to begin and to end. To assume that human rights can be maintained by such a flimsy foundation as postmodern “theory” is naive stupidity.

LGBTQ persons stake a fundamental claim for a right to life and self-determination. The rights and interests of LGBTQ persons therefore lead ineluctably toward a philosophy of life, not a philosophy of death. But by supporting abortion, LGBTQ movements have set the very forces they think will benefit them instead against their very selves.

Human rights have an aspect of the absolute. The most absolute of these rights is the right to life.

To fight for abortion for others while simultaneously demanding human respect for one’s own self is therefore to live a lie. Living this lie about life is a much greater and more fundamental lie than a lie about one’s own sexual identity.

To speak the truth about one’s sexuality, but to deny life to others as a political expedient, sets a powerful and malicious force free to destroy even the innocent. Against this lie and this destruction, the very stones cry out.

© Copyright 2012, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

Aphorism XLIII

January 10th, 2012

When out of power, civil libertarians emphatically repeat “You can’t legislate morality.”

But once in power, they say “The law is a teacher,” and then proceed to legislate their own morality.

Whether in or out of power, there is a little bit of civil libertarian in all of us.

© Copyright 2012, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

Cardinal George’s apology about the Chicago Pride Parade and the Klan

January 7th, 2012

Francis Cardinal George, OMI, offered on 1/6/12 via a Chicago Tribune interview a model first person, humble, concrete, non-metaphorical apology for his remarks about the Chicago Pride Parade 2012 and the Klan of 12/23/12, which he explained in an official statement on 12/27/12.

Particularly striking is the Cardinal’s owning not only his own fear for the religious freedom of the Catholic Church as well as his own love of his gay and lesbian family members and friends, but his willingness to share his regret for hurting others.

The quickest way to get into trouble is to speak an iconic metaphor in the middle of a controversy. Cardinal George’s 12/27/11 statement would have stood on its own merits without the following words: “One such organization is the Ku Klux Klan.”

The quickest way to apologize is to withdraw the metaphor and to state one’s regrets in the first person, taking ownership of and sharing one’s own feelings, while acknowledging the human rights and sensibilities of those who have been hurt.

Cardinal George has been blessed with the grace of apology. Cardinal George has not only apologized well, but set a tone for civil discourse on this issue.

In his book, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, Erich Fromm described one common trait of oppressive societies: the lack of forgiveness. Cardinal George has shown humility, which opens the way for forgiveness.

I am thankful for Cardinal George’s apology, and I hope it is accepted with the same sincerity with which it was offered.

How refreshing to hear an apology from a public figure in Chicago that was not issued before a criminal courts judge: a rare event indeed!

© Copyright 2012, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

Two Spring, 2012 Semester Scholarly Conferences of Note

January 6th, 2012

Just a quick mention of two conferences worth attending–

American Catholic Historical Association, Chicago, January 5-8, 2012. Here’s the program and panel list.

American Weil Society
, Spring, 2012 Conference, Notre Dame University, Simone Weil: the Drama of Grace in the Gravity of Contemporary Society, March 22-25, 2012. Here’s the flyer.

For more on Simone Weil, please see my earlier posts.

© Copyright 2012, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

Cardinal George’s 2011 Christmas Midnight Mass Homily

December 25th, 2011

This is an unofficial transcript of the homily of Francis Cardinal George, OMI, given at Christmas Midnight Mass, 12/25/11, at Holy Name Cathedral, Chicago.

—–

Bishop Lyne, Fr. Ahrens, our honored guests from the Armenian Church this evening, brother priests and deacons, religious women and men, dear brothers and sisters in Christ, friends in the Lord:

Welcome to Holy Name Cathedral: all of you who are gathered here, and all of you connected to us by the medium of television. Welcome to the celebration of the midnight Mass of Christmas. Together we pause and pray.

We gather and open our hearts to God’s love, and the love of our families and friends. We open our hearts as well to all those whom God loves, to the world, saved by the Child whose birth we remember this night.

The celebration of Christmas is a time to ask again a question sometimes put to us by children, and even sometimes put to us by ourselves: Who rules the world? Who really rules the world?

Our quick response might include presidents and other governmental figures, people of wealth, people who influence the shaping of public opinion and the public conversation in the media, people in the halls of power in Washington and other capitals or at the United Nations. In every case those who rule the world as we search for them are powerful people. Those are the people we look for when we try to answer that question, Who rules the world?

Well, all that is in some sense obviously true, it’s also true–Isn’t it?–that the world often isn’t very well ruled. The world opened up to us by Holy Scripture tonight is a world ruled by a Roman emperor Augustus Caesar. He ordered a census, and so two of his subjects, Joseph and Mary, are on their way from Nazareth to Bethlehem, their ancestral town.

But Bethlehem is a city of David, who was a king, a powerful ruler in his day. And Joseph and Mary are of David’s line–his house, a royal family obviously fallen on hard times, obviously out of power.

But hundreds of year before, as was proclaimed in the first reading from the prophet Isaiah, God had given hope to Israel in exile, hope that they would return to their homeland and be ruled again by a king of David’s line. The promise was that God would again use King David and his descendents, but that God Himself would rule, not just Israel, but the entire world.

And then the Gospel reports angels telling shepherds that the Lord has been born. For those shepherds and everyone else around the Mediterranean Sea, Lord meant Caesar Augustus, the Roman emperor. So what was going on? Evidently, a new Lord was now here. God Himself was coming to his people and was claiming the world he had created as His own.

So who rules the world? God. But He has a peculiar way of doing it, and an odd way of showing it. The Eternal and Almighty God comes to us–becomes one of us, takes on our feeble and fallen nature–to rule us.

But he comes, not as a man of power, but as a Child born of a woman without power, and protected only by a man of less than modest means. The Eternal Word of God, in whose image, and through whose wisdom the whole world was created from nothing was without a room in which to be born.

The face of God in human form in the creche here, and in our parish churches, and sometimes in your home, the face of God in human form is that of a humble and defenseless child: not powerful at all.

More, he is born into a world ruled by inequity, unfairness, and oppression, with divisions of all kinds, generating anger, rancor and envy, a world of warfare and hunger and illness and abandonment and corruption and brutality.

Still puzzling over who is really ruling the world, we might ask: If God is ruling the world now, two thousand years after Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem, why are all these evils still with us?

When, like the shepherds we make haste to see Him, turning from the normal distractions of our busy lives, we will, in taking these moments to adore Him, begin to see that He came to His people so that we can change. Ask the Blessed Virgin Mary, His mother and ours. She tells us, as she presents us to her Son, that nothing that happens to us is outside of God’s love. Love and truth, even God’s love and truth, do not overwhelm with power, but they do transform.

The tiny Baby Jesus is the source of whatever greatness is ours. If He is born in our hearts and our families through faith and love, then we enter the world that He rules.

And because Christ is born, we can conquer. We can conquer the habits of sin that separate us from Him and from one another. Habits and addictions–whether they are chemical or sexual, or addictions to power or wealth–need not rule our lives. Corruption and manipulation need not dominate our society. That is our hope fulfilled in the birth of Jesus.

God invites us tonight into a world where we will change, and everything else will change with us, if we cease adoring ourselves, and adore the Baby in the crib.

It is, we all know, a risk to enter into the Kingdom of God. It’s a leap of faith to surrender our entire lives to a powerless child and a crucified Lord. But it is a risk to which we can sincerely invite others as we help them see what we are shown tonight: the true face of God, the ruler of the world, in the Baby of Bethlehem. He respects our freedom, even as He asks us to surrender ourselves to Him.

And when we see how the very humility of His earthy existence is what gives Him the power to judge the world, when He shows us how the power of a world that resists God’s grace is a transitory illusion, then we will understand why we are to serve, to be ever attentive to the cry of the poor, the weak, the outcasts. They are first citizens of God’s Kingdom, without pretense or power, they have only God to protect them, and God expects us to do that work for Him.

O come, let us adore Him.

“O come, let us adore Him” we sang a few minutes ago. The manger in which we adore Him tonight is a throne, as is the cross above the altar.

We gather at the crib, knowing that we will also gather at the cross, for that is how Christ rules the world.

As the gentle power of Christ’s truth and love take possession of our lives in this Eucharistic celebration, may we become like King David and many others in history whom God has used to rule the world. This Christmas, let us enter wholeheartedly into God’s Kingdom as disciples of Jesus Christ, His Son, and our Lord.

And may the joy of God’s rule permeate your lives tonight, and in the days to come transform our society.

Merry Christmas!

—–

© Copyright 2011, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

The Bells of Nagasaki, by the Saint of the Urakami

December 22nd, 2011

The time of 11:02 AM is of universal significance, for that morning hour on August 9, 1945 marked the solar scorch of plutonium fission churning high to toxic ash the Urakami Cathedral district of the Japanese city of Nagasaki.

Incinerated, irradiated, crushed, and swept away below were tens of thousands, and in those frantic following minutes, Dr. Takashi Nagai (1908-1951), Nagasaki University medical school radiology head–himself a nuclear physicist–gasped to pry himself from the death and debris that pinned him into a likely grave.

Like the passage in Matthew 24:40-41–

Two men will be out in the field; one will be taken, and one will be left. Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken, and one will be left.

–those blessed to hit the ground at the right instant endured, while those who somehow shielded the pupils of their eyes preserved sight.

Dr. Nagai and his few surviving nurse and physician colleagues worked themselves past stumbling exhaustion in the blurred weeks of triage and death that followed. Some who seemed to have escaped unscathed instead sickened and died in the ensuing months from the short, merciless gamma waves that penetrated their internal organs in the first milliseconds past 11:02 AM.

Survivors witnessed ghastly epiphanies: heads separated from bodies forming a wide ring around the zero ground; an expectant mother split open with her roasted baby a few feet away, still linked by intact umbilical membrane; Nagai’s lovely wife Midori–a descendent of Catholic martyrs–rendered into charred bone; a delusional mother packing her headless child in her arms, walking to nowhere.

The Fat Man plutonium bomb, according to Dr. Nagai, had missed military targets and torched instead the Catholic St. Mary’s cathedral in Nagasaki, a home to Japan’s historic Catholic martyrs. Nagai placed great significance in this, for he as a Catholic convert saw the suffering of the innocent in the place of the military as sacrificial, an offering for eternal peace and life, instead of senseless death marked by retribution. In the compressed weeks that followed Nagasaki’s holocaust, Nagai emerged from a hard chrysalis of wartime determination to enlightened Christian generosity. He later wrote a technical report on atomic rescue and relief. His young son and daughter somehow survived, and tended to him as he–more and more bare and bound to a sick bed–wrote books, framed poems, and composed calligraphic art until he could do nothing more than pray. His sight ranged from science, to philosophy, to poetry, to prayer.

One of Dr. Nagai’s books in particular, The Bells of Nagasaki, passed US military censors to become a best-seller and film in Japan. Dr. Nagai endured in his hut, a place of pilgrimage for even the Japanese Emperor, until he was removed to die at his beloved medical school in 1951, where he had hoped even his carcass would provide insight into the prevention of suffering for others.

Major Oak Entertainment is producing and fundraising for a film following Dr. Nagai’s story, called All that Remains.

For more on the life of Servant of God Dr. Paul Takashi Nagai, please see the book A Song for Nagasaki by Fr. Paul Glynn, SM, and the related posts at the Why I Am Catholic Blog. I especially recommend Dr. Nagai’s Funeral Speech for the Victims of the Atomic Bomb, and also the separate film about Japanese Catholicism, Hill of Redemption.

I pray that nuclear terror may never claim another city.

© Copyright 2011, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share

The Mass Explained to Children, by Dr. Maria Montessori

December 12th, 2011

While cleaning my office, I came upon a box of books from my late great aunt, Sr. M. Dolores (Alma) Schorsch, OSB, EdD, 1896-1984.

As I reorganized her books, I noticed an original copy of The Mass Explained to Children, by Dr. Maria Montessori, NY, Sheed and Ward, 1933. While the Sheed and Ward edition is out of print, the Kessinger edition and the Roman Catholic Books edition are still available.

What a wonderful book!

I especially recommend Dr. Montessori’s insightful Preface. In this book, despite the pre-Vatican II Mass being described, many parents will find the right words and approach to communicate the mystery of the Mass to their children. How deeply did Dr. Montessori understand and respect the mind of a child, and the theology of the Mass:

Is not the aim of the Mass to make us share in its mysteries, by yielding up the soul to God, in such recollection as is possible only by liberating our minds for a little while from all exterior distractions? This is the very reason why, in the first ages of Christianity, the catechumens were dismissed at the beginning of the Mass of the Faithful. One did not go to this part of Mass for instruction, which is an exterior thing; one went there to be united to Jesus Christ in the most intimate offering of the soul. Instruction in and sharing in the mysteries were seen to be two very different things, and were kept separate.

In actual fact the earliest division of the Mass into two parts was: the Mass of the Catechumens and the Mass of the Faithful. This should have great significance for us.

Maria Montessori, The Mass Explained to Children, with a Foreword by the Reverend Matthew A. Delaney, NY, Sheed and Ward, 1933, pp. xi-xii.

Here are a few more sample pages. . .

© Copyright 2011, Albert J. Schorsch, III
All Rights Reserved

Share